There's an
interesting article in last week's Washington Post about the Commonwealth of Virginia curtailing the use of portfolio assessments in
lieu of the multiple choice Standards of Learning test. But what is the real issue? One quote gives a clue: "Portfolios can be valuable assessment tools within classrooms, but they are problematic for a
large-scale accountability program, in which
cost-effectiveness, consistency and validity are paramount, Wright said.
Teachers spend many hours compiling portfolios, and local school systems are responsible for scoring the tests." The emphases are mine. Scoring the SOL multiple choice test takes seconds, and requires a machine rather than a teacher. So the implication is that the multiple choice test is more valid, because so much of life is like a multiple choice test (sarcasm mine). Cost effectiveness rates only a passing mention. Perhaps the Virginia legislature should have their effectiveness measured by a multiple choice assessment rather than by an evaluation of the body of their work. It might raise their scores.